What are Coca-Cola and PepsiCo doing to fight off the
challenge that their products are unhealthy?
According to last month’s British Medical Journal
the big food companies being allowed to monopolise the funding of most
nutritional research. This leads to big conflicts of interest for the
scientists and can effectively lead to a softening of the impact of collective research (and by that I mean that Big-Food will choose the scientists they want and act to restrict future
funding to anyone who publishes negative findings). And being in the driving seat also enables them
to create an illusion of self-regulation.
The closer we look at the way that sugar industry is run the more we
can tell that they already know that the future looks bad and they are already
preparing for it.
It’s only money that drives the truth into the open. Each year
Coca-cola (and no doubt the rest of them) have to produce a market
risk analysis for their investors, and it openly declares that they live in fear
of two things: that research that will show that their products are unhealthy
and that governments will legislate against them or tax their unhealthy
products.
So is it any surprise that the food
industry want to be so closely involved in the researching and policing of
nutrition?
And so my faith in scientists and their
research takes another battering. These
days I am far more impressed by a doctor
who says “Look, my patients are getting better when they try this diet” than I
am by the words of a scientist who sits
on the board of a panel funded by Coca-Cola.
No comments:
Post a Comment